August 16, 2024
WarOnPress
Memes and rumors had mad the rounds on social media for decades that portrayed Justin Trudeau as Castro’s bastard child.
Many sensible, and some prominent voices disavowed and dismissed such “allegations” as unprovable, unimportant and even a distraction from more pressing concerns. Meanwhile fact checkers dismiss the claim outright as “false” on account of “no evidence,” combined with a ridiculous story about how “unlikely” a meeting unknown to the public would have been a couple months out from when they had official and very public meetings.
It’d certainly not be unreasonable to dismiss a case of “looks like,” or one of a highly public relationship as coincidental. But it’s impossible for any but the willfully ignorant to dismiss both.
Now Hollywood had long mocked the Southerner’s inquiries like “who’s your daddy,” as backwards, and a matter of “old boys club” or nepotism. But famous philosophers like Vattel tender compelling arguments on just how extremely important the answer to such a line of questioning actually is.
The Constitutional requirement for “natural born,” is based entirely on an assessment of conflicts of interest based entirely on a question of “who are the parents,” of a prospective President. And in his Law of Nations, Vattel explains how essential it is to know that the mother, and especially the father need be Americans before their spawn be counted as eligible, and, of course, it’s all about a question of loyalty to the country they’re about to lead.
One might come to understand the above concerns, and become a minority of adequately informed Americans while still being left to wonder, “why does a Canadian Prime Minister’s relationship to, and as bastard son of Fidel Castro matter to a Canadian, much less an American citizen?”
The answer might be intuitive for a fresh mind not overburdened by societal and academic conditioning. But as we often have to explain to those “educated” beyond their intelligence, it shows that there’s a multi-national dynasty that rules over not one, but a collection of nations. And an assumption that surrounding the United States with Communist dictatorships run by a common insidious blood line isn’t strategically important, would be a mistake.
Contrary to a particular woman’s call for a “future unburdened by what has been,” the “what has been” stories of her own history as an anchor baby, and Trudeau’s clear source of loyalty to Communism betray both their policy motivations, to whom they report, and most importantly, the manner in which oligarchs install their own under a thin veil of “democratic elections.”
©2024 WarOnPress
WarOnPress 