Whenever a certain political party appears to be facing a loss of power, events of their making are exploited to take another pass at their biggest ambition of rendering us impotent against their agenda.
The left attack the rights of citizens “to keep and bear arms” from all directions. Most will argue that the 2nd Amendment doesn’t mean what it says while their comrades and sometimes they themselves will argue that the 2nd Amendment must be repealed!
To avoid getting swept into the muck of disingenuous circular arguments slung by the illiberal “liberals” taking aim at gun rights, one can apply a few very simple guidelines to offer efficient service to their education. The strategy I’ve developed breaks down into three very simple steps which are summarized as follows:
Eliminate their game of “interpreting” the hell out of the 2nd Amendment until it means the opposite.
Demonstrate why a REPEAL would be REQUIRED for them to claim any legitimacy to their gun grabbing objectives.
Prove once and for all that nobody should WANT to see…
An excellent and thoughtful article was shared into a debate group. My first attempt to open the RT piece was answered with a big warning dialog concerning “Russia state-controlled media!” If only they’d offer the same courtesy on MK Ultra US Media, or Chinese Controlled media like Forbes (with its 51% ownership by CCP.)
Of course that makes it even more interesting to share the article, and so the link is provided here so that, by sharing this article, we can get these verboten thoughts the attention they deserve.
Stephen King loves to lift his own scary genre from the pages by his unabashed support of real world horror delivered by Democrat policy. But a new author, Nick Sky, delivers a zombie apocalypse to readers on 45’s terms!
Mr. Sky’s grotesque imagination is paired with wicked humor to deliver a gripping tale that will delight zombie enthusiasts, and they may even find themselves tempted to read a particular chapter to their children as a bed time story.
Throughout the unfortunate history of Marxism, Communists have pronounced cleanliness to be a bourgeoisie indulgence that should draw suspicion if not scorned as shameful. A true party comrade had to maintain a close relationship to dirt and filth to prove they were “good workers,” in the constant and eternal struggle towards an elusive “utopia.”
Phil Mudd hasn’t done much to help either the #DEMINFESTED FBI, nor even the CIA’s glowing reputation as an upstanding agency that reports with fidelity to our nation’s present Chief Law Enforcement and Intelligence Officer.
His faked crying performance did very little to allay concerns over the two agencies that performed with distinction in ignoring, enabling, or possibly even arranging the Parkland School Shooting that has accomplished so much for known CIA gun grabbing and domestic regime change agendas.
Just days prior to this amazing performance the same Phil Mudd threatened Trump that his apparent resolve to “take on” his dubious agency would be activate CIA “games” the President would be sure to lose.
Some Americans already knew the CIA wasn’t serving at the pleasure of the White House nor any other legitimate branch of the government elected by We the…
The very word “capitalism” carries a rather broad meaning, and can describe anything from the natural human condition where free men and women make trades and potentially leverage the fruit of their own labor, along with any process or assets that help them build a life that’s more efficient and livable. Put in simple terms, a man who assembles a carriage, or who trades for such an asset with other labors, is then equipped to trade a service of mobility for other services or goods, including those which might, in turn prove helpful in making more efficient offers to neighbors that will in turn yield more appealing trades. It’s also ultimately possible to then trade the carriage itself for some other asset that might either enable offer of other services, or to help fund a retirement to allow more time to enjoy spend with grandchildren.
Whereas, in common use “Capitalism” implies free trades and thus freedom, the same word, “Capitalism,” can also describe the big pot of tyranny of “State Capitalism” or “Soviet Capitalism” that that invariably is delivered at the end of each and every Communist revolution rainbow.
The point of distinction between a Free Market, often described simply as “capitalism,” and the centrally controlled “State Capitalism, ” economy enabled by Marxists is lost on most, and so “Capitalist” and “Capitalism” are treated as an word to simply imply “not Socialist” or “not Communist.”
The, often intentional, failure in distinguishing “Free Market” or simply “capitalism” with the evil of “State Capitalism” proves useful to the Communist who sees an opportunity to scapegoat the destructive aspects of the latter, by blaming what is otherwise nearly synonymous with “Freedom.”
This 1934 cartoon shows that “blame the capitalists” for Communism is both a very old game, and one that’s been adequately overt to be recognized by the larger population.
In the death spiral of any democratic society that’s been toppled by whatever combination of vote fraud and menticide (killing of the mind,) the best indoctrinated of Commies will be all too eager to place blame of they very destruction they helped arrange, on “capitalism.” However clever their self indulgent and malicious game of gaslighting, it’s certainly not reflective of any fresh and new revelations of the Marxist brain.
The great Terrence Williams shared a clip from Dr. Phil on Facebook (presented here) that absolutely settles the whole absurd circus of “pregnant men,” “what is woman?” and bullying about “preferred pronouns.”
Dr. Phil Clip from Terrence Williams
If after watching this clear presentation of facts that cut through all the delusions doesn’t settle this for you, please tell us in the comments.
Gaslighting is a favorite pastie of the leftist. Most sane and rational participants in the new public square have heard every form of it when it comes to the censorship craved by and essential to the leftist ideologues that receive special privileges on all the government connected corporate monopolies to amplify the hateful, anti-capitalist and anti-human messages that are favored by the global elite.
Among the samples of this gaslighting is the disingenuous “Why are you here if you don’t like it?” This carries a special irony when deployed by the same group from which their many of their top ideological leaders “threatened” self deportation to Canada and Europe for not getting their way in an election.
The “why are you here?” club is almost understandable when taking into account their own disingenuous threats to leave whenever things don’t go their way.
Feeling inspired by the challenge of dismantling the left’s favorite games of deception, a response was prepared as follows to the bogus “why are you even here?” question.
I use the internet to maximum potential for a similar reason as my use of the #GlobalCabal partnered corporate monopolies like Comcast (for Internet access,) PG&E (for heating cooling, powering devices,) Amazon, (for convenient shopping, music, videos,) I do enjoy making and maintaining friends in the new public square.
I began leveraging the internet to perform my philanthropy of correcting lefties in 1995, which may be when or before you loaded first liberal diapers. My goal has ALWAYS been to teach what I believe I know, and more ideally to LEARN what I’d yet to discover.
I recognized the advantage of the emerging social media platforms from the very beginning and long before Google abandoned their “do no evil” core value statement. #Fashbook wasn’t my first home for public and private connectedness, and from 2007 (when I joined,) through the 2017, there was absolutely ZERO interference on any of my pages nor groups by the formation of the #SocialMediaTaliBAN.
Since then I’ve endured wildly fascistic actions from the European standards that were introduced by #Twitler and followed on #Fashbook to expand the vile oligarchs’ will to manipulate EVERY election and MOST every online conversation which were supplemented by DIRECT investments (such as the illegal $400 million of campaign contribution violations by #MotherZucker in the past “election,” and even the TREASON of intercepting communications by Twitler AND Fashbook from a sitting PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES.
I’m certain your question is meant to be snide and disingenuous, but I don’t really see it logical to supplement all the suppression of my voice by the most vile of “globalist social networks,” with self imposed exile from the aforementioned corporate-government partnered web pages formerly known as “platforms.” To me that would seem analogous to protest time in solitary confinement with a blindfold, or wrongful incarceration by locking myself into a room the day after my release.
Would that seem logical to you? Do you believe the same goons that obliterated 80 thousand of my Tweets and robbed me of OVER TWO YEARS of access to my own FB pages, groups and even blocked me from REPLIES to Personal Messages would be “upset” or “taught a lesson,” by disabling my OWN accounts?
I could ask why a “aNti-CaPiTaLiSt” like you would use anything more advanced than sticks, stones and smoke signals, to demonstrate your version of “integrity,” or why the women around you fail to abstain to prove their disdain for “the patriarchy,” but I think you already know how foolish that would be and you already are.
In an April 13 2022 editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) “Covid-19 Boosters — Where from Here?” Dr. Paul Offit MD starts with the obligatory praise for mRNA Covid-19 vaccines, but then abruptly switches to a very serious note of alarm about the continued use of boosters.
NEJM has been at the nexus of positive Covid-19 publishing. Its editorial board has the advantage of reviewing a broad sweep of Covid studies. The fact that they decided to publish a blunt warning is highly significant. The message for governments, medical professionals, and medical media commentators and explainers cannot be ignored or underestimated.
The editorial raises a number of questions:
“Unfortunately, studies did not stratify patients according to whether they had coexisting conditions. Therefore, it was unclear who among the younger age groups most benefited from an additional dose.”
WarOnPress 