Democrats Oppose All Happy Endings

March, 8, 2019
Updated May 14, 2019
ODP Staff

Democrats are known for duplicitous messaging on most any subject, and most recently they’ve demonstrated a reversal on the only remaining form of “safe sex,” in the world where the “otherwise paid for” relationships have been made increasingly more “expensive.”

Even the simple Holistic Therapeutic Massage (aka “happy endings,”) has been targeted by the left that once celebrated the rights of therapists to apply their talents, so long as their big government accomplices had a hand in taxing their strenuous labor of hands and leg.

Annoying leftists posing as “centrists” like radio personality Ron Owens would routinely promote “legalization of all prostitution,” but his rationale always focused on how the big government he loves could get their “share” via taxation of the enterprise.

Whereas they love the aspects of “working girls” for what they believe might be a negative impact on family values, they also see such freedom of association, and unfettered entrepreneurial aspects as a threat to the rigid controls to adequately suppress, in particular, the very patrons the service providers rely upon to “get ahead.”

And of course among Democrats, many are simply too cheap to pay for even something as sacred as sex, while others have specific special sexual interests that wouldn’t be protected by any common sense measures to protect the trade.

But of course, however confusing it is to figure out whether, when adequately taxed, the one sort of “happy ending” might be allowed, we can always rely on an unmistakable outrage whenever their latest political target might be smeared by being even remotely associated to a scene where even a hint of happiness might have been realized.

But then, if not for “selective outrage,” there would be no form of mild naughtiness nor outright debauchery (when adequately under their control via regulation and taxation,) they’d not wholeheartedly embrace. And more generally, if not for double standards, Democrats would simply have no standards at all.

Whether or not hand jobs might be permitted under their own strict controls when they get their “cut” of the action, any form of “happy ending” runs contrary to the Democrat’s stiff resolve to deliver all the lives under their own tight grip to a lasting misery.