Now that Trump is safely in the White House and prepared to keep his campaign promise, there is much talk among hysterical liberals that suddenly feign fiscal conservatism with their new obsession of “who will pay for the wall?”
The Wall is as much a concept as a structure and was actually a #DEMOCRATPROMISE (synonym for “lie”) made in exchange to get Ronald Reagan to go along with a 3 million mass amnesty of #ILLEGALALIENS.
To this day liberals are still heralding the challenges to Obama’s eligibility as “debunked” and “racist” “lies” directed only by “conservatives” as an unseemly attack on his proud half-Kenyan heritage.
Trump has been specifically targeted by liberal twits at #FAKENEWS operations like Huffington Post as “racist” for his role in the American process of discovery on this important question.
The lib twit run Huffington Post took one last desperate swing before the American People made their choice a few weeks later in this inane article smearing Trump as “a racist” while enumerating 13 “examples’ as “proof!
Another #LIBTWIT on Twitter posted this inane MEME as the usual sort of argument substitute deployed by the segment that thinks #SUFFRAGE was earned only to have estrogen and emotion determine elections.
It was such a fantastic and comprehensive MEME that it almost made her a better Democrat doctrinaire for having shared it.
Of course I felt it deserved answer, and it would be impossible to do it justice within the few words of a TWEET.
So here’s my answer…
You’re #WITHHER because nothing says #RESPECTFORWOMEN more than slut shaming a 12 yr old after she awoke permanently disabled from her #RAPECOMA, to win a case!
…and no. The #LIBTARD spin site posing as “fact checker” has not debunked the facts of Hillary’s involvement and unethical conduct in that case.
December 7, 2016 Updated September 2, 2021 ODP Staff
While vote fraud as Democrat strategy has become common knowledge to all but the most committed to personal ignorance, the usual suspects deflect incessantly about “voter suppression.” Their primary argument of “suppression” concerns Voter ID laws designed to protect vote integrity.
They’ll even cite examples of real conversation by conservatives that verify there might indeed be certain categories of voters they’d rather not see show up. And so establishing a “motive” becomes a sort of “proof of a crime” to the Democrat doctrinaires.
Additionally they’ll squeal about “minority rights” whenever the voter registration roles are cleaned as required as direct result of the Vote ID laws they themselves have smashed in whatever key battleground States where insufficiency of fraud proves harmful to Democrat candidates.
The basis of Vote ID “suppression” arguments are that “not all eligible voters” have qualifying ID’s. And rather than advocating for an easier time obtaining ID’s they simply conspire with the nearest available Federal Judge to eliminate the ID requirements.