The Superior Moral Justification for Selfishness

December 16, 2016 updated May 28, 2017
ODP contributor Elizabeth

Screen Shot 2017-05-28 at 5.47.01 PM

The search for a superior moral justification for selfishness is modern liberalism.  The liberals simply lust after other people’s money.  Liberals pretend that they care about the poor.  But today’s liberals are nothing but self centered narcissists.

They have no real empathy.  They just react according to their own needs and project those needs onto others.  They think that makes them “caring people.”  They buy into liberal ideologies because they think it shows that they are “smart” as well as “caring.”  Secretly they know they are neither.

Although they remain in denial about their self serving agendas, everything is always about them.   Liberals like Obama, Hillary and their supporters, refuse to see the suffering that their policies bring.  They are destructive in every way to others and to society.

pj o rorke liberal spoiled sniveling brats FB_IMG_1487985239731

“Selfish liberals smear every success in affluence or even self reliance as “greed” while promoting their own lust for the savings and earnings of others’ as “needs” and even “rights!”  ODP

©2016 ODP / WarOnPress

A Secular Argument against “Gay Marriage”

First Published February 16, 2014
Updated October 6, 2022
by League of Men Voters and ODP

The treatment of “gays” has been highly variable throughout all of the Earth’s rich and diverse written history. There has NEVER been ANY society EVER to regard same gender pairs as “married”… not even the Greeks*.

Marriage has always been a societal institution mindful of and critical to the upbringing and safeguarding of children. Those that claim the Fabian Socialist movement exploiting homosexuality is not trying to “redefine” marriage lost that bet when they literally petitioned dictionary dot com to … (drum roll) “redefine marriage”.

Continue reading “A Secular Argument against “Gay Marriage””

Voter Integrity vs. Voter Suppression

December 7, 2016
Updated September 2, 2021

ODP Staff

While vote fraud as Democrat strategy has become common knowledge to all but the most committed to personal ignorance, the usual suspects deflect incessantly about “voter suppression.” Their primary argument of “suppression” concerns Voter ID laws designed to protect vote integrity.

They’ll even cite examples of real conversation by conservatives that verify there might indeed be certain categories of voters they’d rather not see show up.  And so establishing a “motive” becomes a sort of “proof of a crime” to the Democrat doctrinaires.

13450940_981994071897876_6926776895053468991_n

Additionally they’ll squeal about “minority rights” whenever the voter registration roles are cleaned as required as direct result of the Vote ID laws they themselves have smashed in whatever key battleground States where insufficiency of fraud proves harmful to Democrat candidates.

The basis of Vote ID “suppression” arguments are that “not all eligible voters” have qualifying ID’s.  And rather than advocating for an easier time obtaining ID’s they simply conspire with the nearest available Federal Judge to eliminate the ID requirements.

Of course it’s all an act.

Continue reading “Voter Integrity vs. Voter Suppression”