Whenever a certain political party appears to be facing a loss of power, events of their making are exploited to take another pass at their biggest ambition of rendering us impotent against their agenda.
The left attack the rights of citizens “to keep and bear arms” from all directions. Most will argue that the 2nd Amendment doesn’t mean what it says while their comrades and sometimes they themselves will argue that the 2nd Amendment must be repealed!
To avoid getting swept into the muck of disingenuous circular arguments slung by the illiberal “liberals” taking aim at gun rights, one can apply a few very simple guidelines to offer efficient service to their education. The strategy I’ve developed breaks down into three very simple steps which are summarized as follows:
Eliminate their game of “interpreting” the hell out of the 2nd Amendment until it means the opposite.
Demonstrate why a REPEAL would be REQUIRED for them to claim any legitimacy to their gun grabbing objectives.
Prove once and for all that nobody should WANT to see…
Stephen King loves to lift his own scary genre from the pages by his unabashed support of real world horror delivered by Democrat policy. But a new author, Nick Sky, delivers a zombie apocalypse to readers on 45’s terms!
Mr. Sky’s grotesque imagination is paired with wicked humor to deliver a gripping tale that will delight zombie enthusiasts, and they may even find themselves tempted to read a particular chapter to their children as a bed time story.
Throughout the unfortunate history of Marxism, Communists have pronounced cleanliness to be a bourgeoisie indulgence that should draw suspicion if not scorned as shameful. A true party comrade had to maintain a close relationship to dirt and filth to prove they were “good workers,” in the constant and eternal struggle towards an elusive “utopia.”
Phil Mudd hasn’t done much to help either the #DEMINFESTED FBI, nor even the CIA’s glowing reputation as an upstanding agency that reports with fidelity to our nation’s present Chief Law Enforcement and Intelligence Officer.
His faked crying performance did very little to allay concerns over the two agencies that performed with distinction in ignoring, enabling, or possibly even arranging the Parkland School Shooting that has accomplished so much for known CIA gun grabbing and domestic regime change agendas.
Just days prior to this amazing performance the same Phil Mudd threatened Trump that his apparent resolve to “take on” his dubious agency would be activate CIA “games” the President would be sure to lose.
Some Americans already knew the CIA wasn’t serving at the pleasure of the White House nor any other legitimate branch of the government elected by We the…
The very word “capitalism” carries a rather broad meaning, and can describe anything from the natural human condition where free men and women make trades and potentially leverage the fruit of their own labor, along with any process or assets that help them build a life that’s more efficient and livable. Put in simple terms, a man who assembles a carriage, or who trades for such an asset with other labors, is then equipped to trade a service of mobility for other services or goods, including those which might, in turn prove helpful in making more efficient offers to neighbors that will in turn yield more appealing trades. It’s also ultimately possible to then trade the carriage itself for some other asset that might either enable offer of other services, or to help fund a retirement to allow more time to enjoy spend with grandchildren.
Whereas, in common use “Capitalism” implies free trades and thus freedom, the same word, “Capitalism,” can also describe the big pot of tyranny of “State Capitalism” or “Soviet Capitalism” that that invariably is delivered at the end of each and every Communist revolution rainbow.
The point of distinction between a Free Market, often described simply as “capitalism,” and the centrally controlled “State Capitalism, ” economy enabled by Marxists is lost on most, and so “Capitalist” and “Capitalism” are treated as an word to simply imply “not Socialist” or “not Communist.”
The, often intentional, failure in distinguishing “Free Market” or simply “capitalism” with the evil of “State Capitalism” proves useful to the Communist who sees an opportunity to scapegoat the destructive aspects of the latter, by blaming what is otherwise nearly synonymous with “Freedom.”
In the death spiral of any democratic society that’s been toppled by whatever combination of vote fraud and menticide (killing of the mind,) the best indoctrinated of Commies will be all too eager to place blame of they very destruction they helped arrange, on “capitalism.” However clever their self indulgent and malicious game of gaslighting, it’s certainly not reflective of any fresh and new revelations of the Marxist brain.
Gaslighting is a favorite pastie of the leftist. Most sane and rational participants in the new public square have heard every form of it when it comes to the censorship craved by and essential to the leftist ideologues that receive special privileges on all the government connected corporate monopolies to amplify the hateful, anti-capitalist and anti-human messages that are favored by the global elite.
Among the samples of this gaslighting is the disingenuous “Why are you here if you don’t like it?” This carries a special irony when deployed by the same group from which their many of their top ideological leaders “threatened” self deportation to Canada and Europe for not getting their way in an election.
Feeling inspired by the challenge of dismantling the left’s favorite games of deception, a response was prepared as follows to the bogus “why are you even here?” question.
In an April 13 2022 editorial in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) “Covid-19 Boosters — Where from Here?” Dr. Paul Offit MD starts with the obligatory praise for mRNA Covid-19 vaccines, but then abruptly switches to a very serious note of alarm about the continued use of boosters.
NEJM has been at the nexus of positive Covid-19 publishing. Its editorial board has the advantage of reviewing a broad sweep of Covid studies. The fact that they decided to publish a blunt warning is highly significant. The message for governments, medical professionals, and medical media commentators and explainers cannot be ignored or underestimated.
The editorial raises a number of questions:
“Unfortunately, studies did not stratify patients according to whether they had coexisting conditions. Therefore, it was unclear who among the younger age groups most benefited from an additional dose.”