January 28, 2017 Updated July 24, 2020 Occupy Democrats Parody
Language drives culture and attitudes as much as these underlying common understandings and perceptions are reflected in language. Euphemisms serve as an effective barrier between a word’s true meaning, and what we might prefer, or find more “comfortable.”
Just as layers insulate us from cold weather, layering the global pastime of blood sacrifice in a plurality of euphemisms protect us from thinking too much about what, if done in daylight even to a dog, would be an unspeakable atrocity.
Fetus slaughter is given a more neutral term, “feticide” which is in turn wrapped in another euphemism “abortion.” Some might still see that for what it is, and so it becomes simply “choice.” And now an extremely ugly business is both out of sight, and out of mind. What’s more, only “bullies” and “zealots” could ever be opposed to “choice.”
The lib twit run Huffington Post took one last desperate swing before the American People made their choice a few weeks later in this inane article smearing Trump as “a racist” while enumerating 13 “examples’ as “proof!
January 24, 2017
Updated October 12, 2018
Occupy Democrats Parody
Liberals ideologues are true connoisseurs of statism. They will interrupt most any discussion to offer their keen discernments on the various flavors and fragrances of the baby vomit of a big state solutions to move their own personal passion to control others “Forward!”
They’ll invariably inform that National Socialism in Germany wasn’t really “Socialism” but “Fascism.” Not “left” but “right.” And then they’ll go on to advertise their ignorance with proclamation that Socialism has no relationship to Communism nor Marxism. Continue reading “Connoisseurs of Big State Baby Vomit”
Another #LIBTWIT on Twitter posted this inane MEME as the usual sort of argument substitute deployed by the segment that thinks #SUFFRAGE was earned only to have estrogen and emotion determine elections.
It was such a fantastic and comprehensive MEME that it almost made her a better Democrat doctrinaire for having shared it.
Of course I felt it deserved answer, and it would be impossible to do it justice within the few words of a TWEET.
So here’s my answer…
You’re #WITHHER because nothing says #RESPECTFORWOMEN more than slut shaming a 12 yr old after she awoke permanently disabled from her #RAPECOMA, to win a case!
…and no. The #LIBTARD spin site posing as “fact checker” has not debunked the facts of Hillary’s involvement and unethical conduct in that case.
January 9, 2017 Updated July 10 2019 Occupy Democrats Parody
The accusation continues to live on up to and including the inane and baseless rant by Meryl Streep who rang near every bell of the “with Her” campaign talking points.
First the notion that he mocked the disability has been debunked. The exact same mannerism can be viewed on Youtube when he was mocking Cruz.
Second… and MOST importantly, there would not be a darn thing wrong if he HAD mocked the retarded journalist in a more personal way. No good mocking can happen without doing your best to make your target identifiable.
Overall “racism” is delivered as the main concern of Marxist ideology… and as an excuse for redistributionism. In reality every single damn race on Earth shares some common DNA and common intelligence. That same intelligence drives individuals to feel more connected to whatever group is closest to their own family tree… and identifiable differences have long, from an anthropological standpoint been a means of recognizing in-group vs. “outside” groups that, since the stone age have served as dividing lines in competition for land and resources.
In enlightened society it is possible for bonds and unions between the larger set of “brothers and sisters”… and Christianity is owed a debt for promoting the notion that “all are welcome at God’s table.” Continue reading “On the Thought “Crime” of Racism”
December 16, 2016 updated May 28, 2017
ODP contributor Elizabeth
The search for a superior moral justification for selfishness is modern liberalism. The liberals simply lust after other people’s money. Liberals pretend that they care about the poor. But today’s liberals are nothing but self centered narcissists.
They have no real empathy. They just react according to their own needs and project those needs onto others. They think that makes them “caring people.” They buy into liberal ideologies because they think it shows that they are “smart” as well as “caring.” Secretly they know they are neither.
Although they remain in denial about their self serving agendas, everything is always about them. Liberals like Obama, Hillary and their supporters, refuse to see the suffering that their policies bring. They are destructive in every way to others and to society.
“Selfish liberals smear every success in affluence or even self reliance as “greed” while promoting their own lust for the savings and earnings of others’ as “needs” and even “rights!” Occupy Democrats Parody
First Published February 16, 2014 Updated March 26, 2020 by League of Men Voters and Occupy Democrats Parody
The treatment of “gays” has been highly variable throughout all of the Earth’s rich and diverse written history. There has NEVER been ANY society EVER to regard same gender pairs as “married”… not even the Greeks*.
Marriage has always been a societal institution mindful of and critical to the upbringing and safeguarding of children. Those that claim the Fabian Socialist movement exploiting homosexuality is not trying to “redefine” marriage lost that bet when they literally petitioned dictionary dot com to … (drum roll) “redefine marriage”.
While vote fraud as Democrat strategy has become common knowledge to all but the most committed to personal ignorance, the usual suspects deflect incessantly about “voter suppression.” Their primary argument of “suppression” concerns Voter ID laws designed to protect vote integrity.
They’ll even cite examples of real conversation by conservatives that verify there might indeed be certain categories of voters they’d rather not see show up. And so establishing a “motive” becomes a sort of “proof of a crime” to the Democrat doctrinaires.
Additionally they’ll squeal about “minority rights” whenever the voter registration roles are cleaned as required as direct result of the Vote ID laws they themselves have smashed in whatever key battleground States where insufficiency of fraud proves harmful to Democrat candidates.
The basis of Vote ID “suppression” arguments are that “not all eligible voters” have qualifying ID’s. And rather than advocating for an easier time obtaining ID’s they simply conspire with the nearest available Federal Judge to eliminate the ID requirements.